Update - October 19, 2010
2 pages • Page 2
I
K
A
ONLY in a perfect world.. like thats EVER happened in GW.. lol
U
I looked gw.dat but did not find anything ... This update was too small imo, maybe add something more tomorrow, or before the start of the event
I use GWDatBrowser.
And check here maybe - http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Gw.dat_file_format
Quote:
|
Yeah, this is a good question. Can anyone, who knows how to do it, open .dat file and check if there is something new?
|
And check here maybe - http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Gw.dat_file_format
M
K
B
I
I
Quote:
|
I would not expect 7 heroes for a bit. At the earliest, I would guess next Spring. At the latest, it keeps getting postponed and doesn't happen.
|
Unless Anet had the foresight to know that 7 heroes was what the playerbase wanted they have to redo some graphics for 7 heroes. The current interface would not allow you to change hero weapons/runes at all so that needs to be redone somehow.
K
Quote:
|
Sorry I've been gone for a bit, but are 7-heroes actually confirmed and not just an idea now?
and if possible a link |
"You can look forward to filling out your party with Heroes as another feature of the free update build that will include Embark Beach." -John Stumme
Quote:
|
Elementalists and Rangers are waiting for what? Not a buff I hope.
But Dervs and Paras...well...thats another story.. |
Elementalists are good for ER and that's about it. They are terrible at their primary function. Rangers are just bad period.
Quote:
|
Dervishes are only bad because they are outclassed by warriors and assassins. If it weren't for that they'd be a very good class.
Elementalists are good for ER and that's about it. They are terrible at their primary function. Rangers are just bad period. |


