Theres 26 easily maxable titles from just gameplay (vanquing carting etc). Luxon/Kurz are easy enough to max now, just take a bit of grind. (28). You then have lucky, unlucky, wisdom, and treasure hunter that you can max, which you can increase whilst your doing every part of the game. You can also increase them after you have maxed the other 28 titles.
So thats 32 relatively easy titles, gwamm with 2 to spare. Cons are just blowing money (and lets be honest, after getting 26 titles, most people have enough money for atleast one of them).
I personally think its ridiculous that you can have a level 1 character with KOABD. Having a lvl1 with GWAMM is just retarded.
Make GWAMM an account based title.
3 pages • Page 2
Plenty of reasons that this would be a bad idea, as stated by others in this thread.
1. What about the people who already have GWAMM on multiple characters?;
2. GWAMM on a level 1? Seriously?;
3. What would you do after getting GWAMM on your first character? Game complete? As mentioned above, grinding out GWAMM on several characters is the reason that many people are still playing;
4. GWAMM is easy enough, as shown by example in this thread, without LDoA or LS;
5. Anet wouldn't change it. Mainly due to point 1.
1. What about the people who already have GWAMM on multiple characters?;
2. GWAMM on a level 1? Seriously?;
3. What would you do after getting GWAMM on your first character? Game complete? As mentioned above, grinding out GWAMM on several characters is the reason that many people are still playing;
4. GWAMM is easy enough, as shown by example in this thread, without LDoA or LS;
5. Anet wouldn't change it. Mainly due to point 1.
/notsigned.
survivor and LDoA are mutually exclusive for a reason. don't need people with 37 maxed titles. The title doen't need to be made any easier seeing as many people have already achieved it. you would be downplaying the achievements of people who have already achieved gwamm on multiple characters. absolutely not.
survivor and LDoA are mutually exclusive for a reason. don't need people with 37 maxed titles. The title doen't need to be made any easier seeing as many people have already achieved it. you would be downplaying the achievements of people who have already achieved gwamm on multiple characters. absolutely not.
R
Its fine enough that there are a few account wide titles already, but really? The gwamm title should be a sign that you have done all of the game (or at least most of it)
Running around in pre or shing jea with a title that signals that you have done all the missions, all dungeons etc is plain ridiculous.
/notsigned
Running around in pre or shing jea with a title that signals that you have done all the missions, all dungeons etc is plain ridiculous.
/notsigned
It'd be easier to just make eotn titles and sweet/alehound/party animal account based. To avoid whining from all the grinders who made it to r6 already (seriously it's not hard, it just requires a whole hell of alot of time most of us don't have which is why we chosoe to play a casual game liek GW).
/signed. GTFO elitists
/signed. GTFO elitists
Quote:
|
It'd be easier to just make eotn titles and sweet/alehound/party animal account based. To avoid whining from all the grinders who made it to r6 already (seriously it's not hard, it just requires a whole hell of alot of time most of us don't have which is why we chosoe to play a casual game liek GW).
/signed. GTFO elitists |
Stop being lazy. It is a MAX title rank for a reason. GW is a game of grind, you don't like it, go play something else.
I would /sign to the idea of making drunkard, sweet tooth, and party animal account-wide. /sign to the idea of reducing the grind involved in the account-wide titles as well (luxon, treasure hunter, etc.) as well as some of the pve ones (the eotn rep titles, come on.)
However, /not signed to account-wide titles, and account-wide GWAMM. Some people enjoy doing multiple legendary survivors the old-fashioned way - at this point that's the only thing that makes me enjoy NM pve since it's otherwise too easy for me. And GWAMM, excluding the consumables titles and the eotn rep titles, is actually pretty easy and grind-free to get if you enjoy pve. I just wish it was clear that it wasn't needed for the GW2 bonuses, since a full hall ought to be enough.
However, /not signed to account-wide titles, and account-wide GWAMM. Some people enjoy doing multiple legendary survivors the old-fashioned way - at this point that's the only thing that makes me enjoy NM pve since it's otherwise too easy for me. And GWAMM, excluding the consumables titles and the eotn rep titles, is actually pretty easy and grind-free to get if you enjoy pve. I just wish it was clear that it wasn't needed for the GW2 bonuses, since a full hall ought to be enough.
G
P
D
Quote:
| I would /sign to the idea of making drunkard, sweet tooth, and party animal account-wide. |
Quote:
| /sign to the idea of reducing the grind involved in the account-wide titles as well (luxon, treasure hunter, etc.) |
They already made these too easy, treasure hunter didn't use to be account based, and i was 8k chests in to my second character when they made it account based. Not to mention i needed to run 17,000 chests to max unlucky, and nowadays ppl max luck/unlucky before they max th... (also bonus weekends help for this a lot...)
And for luxon and kurzick... so easy, especially with all these double rewards weekends...
Quote:
| as well as some of the pve ones (the eotn rep titles, come on.) |
As for gwamm account based... /notsigned
I have had 35 maxed on my monk for well over 2 years now and not even I will attempt LDOA, make that account based and then I might...
Survivor account based? /signed. hmm why not, then I will have 36 and won't feel like deleting my monk and starting over anymore...
/not signed. i don't even have this title, but it's meant to represent skill, not be a necessity. work towards it, if you're concerned about HoM then shouldn't it be more of a suggestion to have it shown in the monument of honor at a lower rank?
Also Sweet/party titles aren't terrible, it can be done in under an hour if you have all the items.
Also Sweet/party titles aren't terrible, it can be done in under an hour if you have all the items.
I would suggest some people re-read my OP.
For players that just recently started out (or even within the past year and 1/2), its not feasible to complete the other account based titles within a year.
I'm really happy for 'yall that got them, and I'ma let you finish, but Lucky/Unlucky/Seeker of wisdom mean sweet FA to the rest of us.
How so? Did you actually take the time to read what I wrote? If you can max different titles on different characters and still have that work translate into GWAMM, how would that discourage a player?
Unless you've been grinding GWAMM characters b/c there's nothing left to do, most players will only see a benefit.
For players that just recently started out (or even within the past year and 1/2), its not feasible to complete the other account based titles within a year.
I'm really happy for 'yall that got them, and I'ma let you finish, but Lucky/Unlucky/Seeker of wisdom mean sweet FA to the rest of us.
Quote:
|
/not signed....totally unnecessary to the game. I LIKE playing all my different characters this would basically say 'just play one character' no way!
|
Unless you've been grinding GWAMM characters b/c there's nothing left to do, most players will only see a benefit.

