Firefox Over IE?

1 pages Page 1
Zebideedee
Zebideedee
Jungle Guide
#1
Sorry if this is in the wrong section. Anywhoo, I read on a couple of other posts about Firefox being recommended over Internet Explorer in terms of security, I was just curious about what the security risks are with IE? I recently installed Firefox and would be grateful if someone could enlighten me on this. Everyone else I've asked says what amounts to "Yeah use Firefox!" but can't give many a reason why.
Ghengis Kwell
Ghengis Kwell
Baby Maker
#2
I think in many ways it's the attitude of people towards good old Bill and his company , seems like all the hackers/bad guys loathe him so the majority of viruses/trojans etc. are aimed at making him look bad and exposing exploits whereas Firefox is perceived as being 'cooler' , just an opinion of course I could be wrong
Hollygen
Hollygen
Core Guru
#4
As Ghengis Kwell mentions IE gets targetted by malicious code writers.

That's part to make Microsoft look bad, but also, since Windows integrates IE into much of it's day to day functionality it acts as more of a gateway the hackers can attack to compromise whole systems.

Firefox isn't immune to being targetted, but it is less so. In addition Firefox has the flexibility of add ons that can boost your security. Tools such as NoScript help mitigate malicious code injection through Flash and Javascript.
If an advert supplying service gets compromised, as they do sometimes, then their customers' websites get compromised (just look at Guru getting blacklisted by Google briefly a couple of weeks back for an infected ad).
Zebideedee
Zebideedee
Jungle Guide
#5
Okey Dokey, Thanks guys, sorry for asking something in a forum Dmitri3, next time I'll google it and remain silent, good enough?
T
The Air Revenger
Lion's Arch Merchant
#6
i use google chrome as my browser, i like the setup and incognito mode.
j
jiggles
Desert Nomad
#7
Can you press the mouse button in and then move up and down in chrome yet?
s
shump
Ascalonian Squire
#8
"An independent study shows that, in 2006, IE users were vulnerable to online threats 78% of the time. Firefox users? Only 2%."

“At risk” defined as publicly available exploits with no patch. Source: “Internet Explorer users Unsafe for 284 Days in 2006”
Brian Krebs, Washington Post, 1/4/2007
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/security/
lewis91
lewis91
Wilds Pathfinder
#9
Quote:
Originally Posted by shump View Post
"An independent study shows that, in 2006, IE users were vulnerable to online threats 78% of the time. Firefox users? Only 2%."

“At risk” defined as publicly available exploits with no patch. Source: “Internet Explorer users Unsafe for 284 Days in 2006”
Brian Krebs, Washington Post, 1/4/2007
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/security/
Rofl owned, but like the other guys said, its more down to the popularity, and the malicious code writers, think about it, Windows is the most common OS for the average pc buyer, and IE comes standard with it, thus an attempt to hack IE, means you could probably infect a very large amount of pc users.

Same with anti virus', if you have one well advertised, and most common, then it is most likely targeted by hackers. I once had norton, and i was getting a virus a month, doesnt mean theyre bad at protecting, just means theyre being hacked faster than they can prevent.
Arduin
Arduin
Grotto Attendant
#10
Is that 2006 data still valid in 2009?
ac1inferno
ac1inferno
Desert Nomad
#11
I use Firefox over IE also because I read somewhere that it has less security risks, but that was a long time ago and I'm not sure about now.
Abedeus
Abedeus
Grotto Attendant
#12
Everything is better than IE. Opera, Firefox, Chrome.
Elder III
Elder III
Furnace Stoker
#13
IE stinks..... I only use it for a couple of sites that don't load properly with firefox.... for everything else Mozilla is the better choice hands down (and that's without taking into account the increased risk of virus/trojan/worms/bots/etc on IE).
iVendetta
iVendetta
Lion's Arch Merchant
#14
On top of security, Firefox is immensely customizable and it is also fast (not as fast as Google Chrome though).
MStarfire
MStarfire
Krytan Explorer
#15
Not only are their fewer security risks, but firefox is faster than both IE7 and IE8.

However, Firefox has a rather large memory footprint, especially when multiple tabs are open. I suggest a browser like Chrome due to its small footprint and independent-process tab architecture, though it is lacking in some features (and doesn't like Guru for some reason).

I recently switched to Safari 4 Beta for evaluation purposes, and while it's faster and incredibly customizable, it suffers from gigantic memory problems. It's currently using 163,596k of memory. That's nearly three times what Firefox uses, and almost ten times what Chrome uses.

Your choice of browser is up to you, but really the bottom line is "don't use IE".
iVendetta
iVendetta
Lion's Arch Merchant
#16
Quote:
Originally Posted by MStarfire View Post
I suggest a browser like Chrome due to its small footprint and independent-process tab architecture, though it is lacking in some features (and doesn't like Guru for some reason).
The browser being released in the 21st century, it does not have smooth-scrolling. That is sad.
Burning Freebies
Burning Freebies
Krytan Explorer
#17
I recommend Firefox, as it provides more protection.
MStarfire
MStarfire
Krytan Explorer
#18
Quote:
Originally Posted by iVendetta View Post
The browser being released in the 21st century, it does not have smooth-scrolling. That is sad.
Like I said, it's lacking in some features, but it runs small. That's a big deal to power-users who routinely have many programs open at once.
pamelf
pamelf
Forge Runner
#19
I don't use IE because it's non-standards compliable. Apart from that I can block all cookies and scripts through firefox add-ons. Depending on what you want to do I find that add-ons for firefox can come in really useful.
Dmitri3
Dmitri3
Wilds Pathfinder
#20
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewis91 View Post
Rofl owned, but like the other guys said, its more down to the popularity, and the malicious code writers, think about it, Windows is the most common OS for the average pc buyer, and IE comes standard with it, thus an attempt to hack IE, means you could probably infect a very large amount of pc users.

Same with anti virus', if you have one well advertised, and most common, then it is most likely targeted by hackers. I once had norton, and i was getting a virus a month, doesnt mean theyre bad at protecting, just means theyre being hacked faster than they can prevent.
Popularity is NOT an excuse! If it's more popular then they get more money thus they are able to hire more people to fix holes. If they can't do that, it just says they're shitty, that's all.

Open Source has another way to do this though. More popular means more people willing to put in their own time into the project (fix holes, make addons, etc.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zebideedee View Post
Okey Dokey, Thanks guys, sorry for asking something in a forum Dmitri3, next time I'll google it and remain silent, good enough?
Asking is okay. I never said you shouldn't ask, I just said you should do your own research as well.