Paragon females are not sexy barbie dolls!
4 pages • Page 3
I do agree with you, it's ugly. However, it's quite probably all we'll got in terms of coverage. I mean, look at this one. Makes me want to sing "Roxanne".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tijger
Oh I see.
So, what do you define as modest then? Wide fitting garment from head to toe which doesnt show any exposed skin? |
IF the player chooses to dress up in that - since we are talking about a GAME and NOT real life - fine with me.
Variety FTW!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by acidic
the female players should be flattered that the dev cared so much to make those special sexy armors
|
Yep girls - you should be flattered that you can look like the cheapest RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOs in the game and that you don't need to worry about your big fat real life asses so that you can finally get a man and start throwing out kiddies!
(rolleyes emote anyone?)
So I once again fully support the option for various armours.
The game is offering a serious amount of customization - and looks are very important in terms of the whole RGP-immersion.
Options, options, options = good, good, good!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shakkara
I really dont like that one.
Still uncovered belly and the fur is just ugly. |
If the thing you want most is a full body suit - then style comes second.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aera
Okay, I'll try to put this the right way:
No-one really cares, pay attention to the game not to the armour. Or stop complaining here and play another character or make a male paragon. Problem solved, less of GWGuru's bandwidth wasted. |
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...0187417&page=1
please, continue thinking you can read minds and tell people what to do. its funny.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by upier
Why not?
IF the player chooses to dress up in that - since we are talking about a GAME and NOT real life - fine with me. Variety FTW! That one is sweet! Yep girls - you should be flattered that you can look like the cheapest RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOs in the game and that you don't need to worry about your big fat real life asses so that you can finally get a man and start throwing out kiddies! (rolleyes emote anyone?) So I once again fully support the option for various armours. The game is offering a serious amount of customization - and looks are very important in terms of the whole RGP-immersion. Options, options, options = good, good, good! |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by upier
Now this might be a bit of a problem.
If the thing you want most is a full body suit - then style comes second. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tijger
Oh I see.
So, what do you define as modest then? Wide fitting garment from head to toe which doesnt show any exposed skin? |
a paragon male looks like a RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOing super gay.
females in reality are more sexy than males too. why not in a fantasy game too.
GREAT! <3
females in reality are more sexy than males too. why not in a fantasy game too.
GREAT! <3
K
This topic is ridiculous.
I guess you're the folks that tell me in real-life to go and dress in something proper. Here is the shocking news: It's 2007, no longer 1200. I'm really sorry for you but times have changed.
What is the problem about revealing armor or clothes? Is it morales? Once again, wake up and enjoy the new Millenium. Is it for realism? Yeah, tell me about realism, but please wait until after i've had my sit in with that dragon over there and poked him with my flame spitting sword. Oppression from males? No really?
The whole reason we can finally wear something revealing is because the oppression is dwindling. It's not the evil drooling man that tells us to wear sexy dresses, we do wear them because we CAN. A funny thing is that I see mostly MEN complain about women showing too much (in Real-life too). Is it because you then can plainly see you're losing your control over the other gender? Oops.
So what else is there really? Any argument left that isn't based on morales from the middle-ages or something similiar silly?
I guess you're the folks that tell me in real-life to go and dress in something proper. Here is the shocking news: It's 2007, no longer 1200. I'm really sorry for you but times have changed.
What is the problem about revealing armor or clothes? Is it morales? Once again, wake up and enjoy the new Millenium. Is it for realism? Yeah, tell me about realism, but please wait until after i've had my sit in with that dragon over there and poked him with my flame spitting sword. Oppression from males? No really?
The whole reason we can finally wear something revealing is because the oppression is dwindling. It's not the evil drooling man that tells us to wear sexy dresses, we do wear them because we CAN. A funny thing is that I see mostly MEN complain about women showing too much (in Real-life too). Is it because you then can plainly see you're losing your control over the other gender? Oops.
So what else is there really? Any argument left that isn't based on morales from the middle-ages or something similiar silly?
Let me begin by saying that I fully appreciate your wish for more coverage from the paragon armour - Choice is a beautiful thing.
Indeed, this is completely true. However...
(more examples)
http://imagesource5d.allposters.com/...7-FT3BD00Z.jpg
http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/Steril...es/hoplite.jpg
...practical does not always indicate that is "decent" by todays standards
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shakkara
The Greeks actually wore metal or leather breastplates during those times. [SNIP] So the Greek actually DID wear practical armor.
|
(more examples)
http://imagesource5d.allposters.com/...7-FT3BD00Z.jpg
http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/Steril...es/hoplite.jpg
...practical does not always indicate that is "decent" by todays standards

A
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kas
This topic is ridiculous.
I guess you're the folks that tell me in real-life to go and dress in something proper. Here is the shocking news: It's 2007, no longer 1200. I'm really sorry for you but times have changed. What is the problem about revealing armor or clothes? Is it morales? Once again, wake up and enjoy the new Millenium. Is it for realism? Yeah, tell me about realism, but please wait until after i've had my sit in with that dragon over there and poked him with my flame spitting sword. Oppression from males? No really? The whole reason we can finally wear something revealing is because the oppression is dwindling. It's not the evil drooling man that tells us to wear sexy dresses, we do wear them because we CAN. A funny thing is that I see mostly MEN complain about women showing too much (in Real-life too). Is it because you then can plainly see you're losing your control over the other gender? Oops. So what else is there really? Any argument left that isn't based on morales from the middle-ages or something similiar silly? |
K
T
Good lord, has GW been invaded by fundamentalists or something?
WTF is wrong with people?
No, really, its nothing to do with age, I'm 43 and I have no issues with bare bellies and cleavage in bloody fantasy game which is rated at 13+
WTF is wrong with people?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kas
Yep. Definitely a case of middle age morales.
|
T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shakkara
No, the problem is CHOICE. If you want to wear this stuff, fine, no problem. I don't care what you want to wear. You can do that, you can even go to a nudist camp, I don't care. I DONT want to wear this stuff, it doesn't fit me, it offends me, but I can't wear anything else. Then it becomes a problem, right?
|

