A lot of people play Guild Wars for the lack of a monthly fee. It's nice, I will definitely admit. But I find that in Guild Wars we have a series of problems that are constant. Things the community asks for or complains about go unheeded, and I would say (only considering the players I know personally) customer satisfaction is fairly low, especially (almost only) after the release of Factions.
I'm not trying to be the "Screw Anet *$)!%&#@()*!" guy, but I see and feel this in my Guild Wars experience:
1) Old issues go mostly unresolved for long periods of time, or permanently.
~ Took 2 years to increase storage space, and a few months to revert HA to 8vs8.
2) Things we didn't want/need are added frequently instead of fixes or additions we request personally.
~Soul Reaping "fix". (And with continuity to my first statement, it's seemingly gone unresolved about a month now.)
I think that this is a direct affect of the lack of subscription fee. Once they have our money, we are account holders and offer little in the way of money for them after that until the next game is released. But the more things they add, the bigger the game seems and the more random stuff that is included, the more people can read about when thinking of purchasing the game.
I don't think this kind of "abuse" would happen in a game with a subscription fee. If, let's say, Guild Wars had a fee from the beginning; If the game developers nerfed Soul Reaping and the same response from the players came about that did with the actual GW, I don't think there would have been a moments' haste in meeting the demands of the paying customers, and either reverting it, or just doing what over 75% of each individual community asked and "make SR cancel out spirit gain". But no, Anet knows better than us don't they. They know better what we actually want.
When I started playing this game, I didn't give a crap about the developers. I made a purchase on a great game, and LOVED the hell out of it for a long time. But I've found the development team ominously and cruelly destroying what I loved about the game slowly over the course of the last year or so.
I've been looking desperately for an alternate game to play, but WoW is garbage, Everq is just... no... and the assortment of other MMos that were the reason I enjoyed and relished in GW in the first place are all useless to me. So I just haven't been playing MMos at all, which is sad because I enjoy(ed) them.
I suppose I'm not the only person that feels "tossed about" by Anet, like we have no control over what we want, am I?
No Montly Fee ::: Maybe Not So Great
2 pages • Page 1
Less whine please. No one is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to play. Don't like it anymore? Fine, don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
Before whining about why SR was changed, there's already a huge crybaby thread for that, attempt to nderstand why the change was made.
If HA was reverted after a couple weeks, the crying would have been just as loud from those that preferred it. And you have no clue if there were other things preventing a reversion.
Your post is typical of the petulant brats that complain merely for the sake of complaining. It's nothing but a whine without any sort of suggestion.
Before whining about why SR was changed, there's already a huge crybaby thread for that, attempt to nderstand why the change was made.
If HA was reverted after a couple weeks, the crying would have been just as loud from those that preferred it. And you have no clue if there were other things preventing a reversion.
Your post is typical of the petulant brats that complain merely for the sake of complaining. It's nothing but a whine without any sort of suggestion.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hockster
Less whine please. No one is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to play. Don't like it anymore? Fine, don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
|
Quote:
| Before whining about why SR was changed, there's already a huge crybaby thread for that |
Quote:
| attempt to nderstand why the change was made. |
"attempting to understand" it is more than simple. Just because you're a tool who just lets things be as they be doesn't mean the rest of us have to, or will.
Quote:
| If HA was reverted after a couple weeks, the crying would have been just as loud from those that preferred it. |
You just proved my thread.
Quote:
| And you have no clue if there were other things preventing a reversion. |
Quote:
| Your post is typical of the petulant brats that complain merely for the sake of complaining. It's nothing but a whine without any sort of suggestion. |
I would suggest being constructive merely so that you can post words, but I'd hate to have someone as "slow" as yourself contaminate more of my threads, so I do hope you continue the way you're going.
Anet has created a great game and claiming that they are screwing you is pathetic.
Anet already gave you storage space, and they did not take any back. Anything else they gave you is a bonus, so just be grateful that they gave you extra space instead of complaining about it.
Changing HA from 6v6 to 8v8 is all a matter of changing a single value in their servers. The change to 6v6 was an attempt to make the game better, which after some time, Anet reached the conclusion that it did not work. In another attempt to make the game better, they reverted back to 8v8.
As for Soul Reaping, who says we didn't want that change? Necros had way too much energy. This is overall a balance in the game. Anet is trying to make the game better. This has nothing to do with the fact that you don't pay a monthly fee.
Get over yourself.
And if you still want to pay a monthly fee, I'll give you my bank details.
Anet already gave you storage space, and they did not take any back. Anything else they gave you is a bonus, so just be grateful that they gave you extra space instead of complaining about it.
Changing HA from 6v6 to 8v8 is all a matter of changing a single value in their servers. The change to 6v6 was an attempt to make the game better, which after some time, Anet reached the conclusion that it did not work. In another attempt to make the game better, they reverted back to 8v8.
As for Soul Reaping, who says we didn't want that change? Necros had way too much energy. This is overall a balance in the game. Anet is trying to make the game better. This has nothing to do with the fact that you don't pay a monthly fee.
Get over yourself.
And if you still want to pay a monthly fee, I'll give you my bank details.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Henchman
Anet has created a great game and claiming that they are screwing you is pathetic.
Anet already gave you storage space, and they did not take any back. Anything else they gave you is a bonus, so just be grateful that they gave you extra space instead of complaining about it. |
Quote:
| Changing HA from 6v6 to 8v8 is all a matter of changing a single value in their servers. The change to 6v6 was an attempt to make the game better, which after some time, Anet reached the conclusion that it did not work. |
Quote:
| In another attempt to make the game better, they reverted back to 8v8. |
Quote:
| As for Soul Reaping, who says we didn't want that change? Necros had way too much energy. This is overall a balance in the game. Anet is trying to make the game better. This has nothing to do with the fact that you don't pay a monthly fee. |
Quote:
| Get over yourself. |
Quote:
| And if you still want to pay a monthly fee, I'll give you my bank details. |
S
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mesmerman
I don't think this kind of "abuse" would happen in a game with a subscription fee. If, let's say, Guild Wars had a fee from the beginning; If the game developers nerfed Soul Reaping and the same response from the players came about that did with the actual GW, I don't think there would have been a moments' haste in meeting the demands of the paying customers, and either reverting it, or just doing what over 75% of each individual community asked and "make SR cancel out spirit gain". But no, Anet knows better than us don't they. They know better what we actually want.
|
you have no grasp at what arenanet thinks.
arenanet does not claim to know better what 'we' want, arenanet knows better what is best for this game. Maybe your ideas about spirits went trough their mind, went trough in tests, but came out wrong too...
nobody can say that because you dont work at arenanet and thus dont have the power to have tested anything about that.
make suggestions, and if arenanet chooses not to continue with that line of thought that is because they dont find it needed, or its not good enough, or it makes something else totally out of ballance, or anything else.
but dont make this into "arenanet is ignoring us, and it is thinking they know better what we want"!
yes i agree pay to play has its positive sides, but i do not think your arguments are correct. i dont think arenanet would listen better than they do now just because you pay them every month.
certain other arguments can be brought in yes, if it were pay to play, the community's average age would go up with 5-10 years. and half of those people whining and ranting on these boards would finaly stop playing GW like they keep claiming to be doing after every update that hits their class.
oh for that reason alone i'd pay 15 euros a week. :P
but arenanet listening better than they do now? thats impossible (figuratively speaking, i hope you get the point, no need to show me where exactly they still could listen better, just working towards a point which you should have understood by now)
Quote:
| Your whining about me whining is less pointed than me whining. |
... though his last sentence was a bit too much.
Quote:
| This thread isn't about SR. Can not you read? |
PROTIP: Not everyone agrees that the reasons behind doing it were right.
"attempting to understand" it is more than simple. Just because you're a tool who just lets things be as they be doesn't mean the rest of us have to, or will.
Quote:
|
So the opinions of the established players who were complaining don't matter in comparison to the players who like the newer things, and them leaving the game was worth trying something new to bring more people in? You just proved my thread.
|
Quote:
| If they cared enough, they'd explain it. They seem to do so on other issues. |
Quote:
| Your post is typical of the obnoxious mindless forum-runner who cares to put thought into what they post about as much as they care about other peoples' opinions. I'm not asking you to care about my opinion, but there are rules and guidelines to follow on these forums if you want to continue posting here. |
Quote:
|
I would suggest being constructive merely so that you can post words, but I'd hate to have someone as "slow" as yourself contaminate more of my threads, so I do hope you continue the way you're going. |
To actually contribute.
No Monthly Fee is supposed to be relevant to game support? Hahahahahaha.
Storage was just an extra, don't complain about actually GETTING IT. I wouldn't mind Anet taking away your personal extra storage just to show you a lesson about thankfulness.
Soul Reaping was abused, and it got 'fixed', albeit a bit wrongly. But they're working on a solution, and give them time to work on it, and test it. If we'd let people on the forums fix it, it'll turn out for the worst.
And for the finishing touch:
Quote:
| I suppose I'm not the only person that feels "tossed about" by Anet, like we have no control over what we want, am I? |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Saelfaer
you had me smiling at that part... not that i agree, but just another well thought of rant against arenanet. good luck, won't do nothing because rants are generally ignored. and i'm happy for that.
|

Quote:
|
you have no grasp at what arenanet thinks. arenanet does not claim to know better what 'we' want, arenanet knows better what is best for this game. Maybe your ideas about spirits went trough their mind, went trough in tests, but came out wrong too... nobody can say that because you dont work at arenanet and thus dont have the power to have tested anything about that. |
Quote:
|
make suggestions, and if arenanet chooses not to continue with that line of thought that is because they dont find it needed, or its not good enough, or it makes something else totally out of ballance, or anything else. but dont make this into "arenanet is ignoring us, and it is thinking they know better what we want"! |
Quote:
| yes i agree pay to play has its negative sides, but i do not think your arguments are correct. i dont think arenanet would listen better than they do now just because you pay them every month. |
Quote:
|
certain other arguments can be brought in yes, if it were pay to play, the community's average age would go up with 5-10 years. and half of those people whining and ranting on these boards would finaly stop playing GW like they keep claiming to be doing after every update that hits their class. oh for that reason alone i'd pay 15 euros a week. :P |
Quote:
| but arenanet listening better than they do now? thats impossible (figuratively speaking, i hope you get the point, no need to show me where exactly they still could listen better, just working towards a point which you should have understood by now) |
Quote:
| It's not like they're being very helpful with that. They leave me (and many others) no choice but to go on assumption alone. They have a news article that basically just says "lalallalalal new event weekend!" once a week. (see: Scribe) |
S
yes but you missed the care they put in guildwars.
no game has such a support and pr behind as guildwars has.
i mean compared with the prices.
what you are stating is if half teh community says 'remove A' and they all payed to play guildwars, arenanet should just obey like a slave?
no, let them run the tests, let them figure out if its a good suggestion (because from your point the community rather states Demands than suggestions which is something i dont like) and if its not a good suggestion let them choose not to implement.
its still their game, they decide, no idea why they SHOULD do it because everyone is asking them to.
if this game was pay to play, and arenanet gave as mutch care to this game as they do now (without pay to play) i would be in my believe that nothing would change. because they already give good support, and add a great amount of suggested things ( too bad for you your suggestion wasnt taken in)
PS: this was my last reply to this thread though.
i just can't stand it. you dont take any suggestion or reply in this thread serious, and seem to be certain of the amount of truth in your own statement. if you are so certain you were right, dont post it here, enjoy statement by yourself. no need to annoy others with it if your only goal is to laugh em in the face with replying jokes and offensive counters to every line they type.
no game has such a support and pr behind as guildwars has.
i mean compared with the prices.
what you are stating is if half teh community says 'remove A' and they all payed to play guildwars, arenanet should just obey like a slave?
no, let them run the tests, let them figure out if its a good suggestion (because from your point the community rather states Demands than suggestions which is something i dont like) and if its not a good suggestion let them choose not to implement.
its still their game, they decide, no idea why they SHOULD do it because everyone is asking them to.
if this game was pay to play, and arenanet gave as mutch care to this game as they do now (without pay to play) i would be in my believe that nothing would change. because they already give good support, and add a great amount of suggested things ( too bad for you your suggestion wasnt taken in)
PS: this was my last reply to this thread though.
i just can't stand it. you dont take any suggestion or reply in this thread serious, and seem to be certain of the amount of truth in your own statement. if you are so certain you were right, dont post it here, enjoy statement by yourself. no need to annoy others with it if your only goal is to laugh em in the face with replying jokes and offensive counters to every line they type.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Saphatorael
He isn't whining, he just wants to get rid of whiners like you, and just expresses WHY this doesn't need another thread.
|
Quote:
| 'Established players'... Not everyone reads forums, and the people on the forums definitely aren't alot smarter than those who don't. |
Quote:
| Some people just stay away from forums to avoid retarded discussions or rants like yours. |
Quote:
| If they feel the need to explain it, they do. Care doesn't have to do anything with it. |
Quote:
| Whoa, getting quite warm there. |
Quote:
| No Monthly Fee is supposed to be relevant to game support? Hahahahahaha. |
...
Wait, what was funny?
Quote:
| Storage was just an extra, don't complain about actually GETTING IT. I wouldn't mind Anet taking away your personal extra storage just to show you a lesson about thankfulness. |
Quote:
| Soul Reaping was abused, and it got 'fixed', albeit a bit wrongly. But they're working on a solution, and give them time to work on it, and test it. If we'd let people on the forums fix it, it'll turn out for the worst. |
Quote:
|
And for the finishing touch: You're not a dev, period. Make your own game if you want to make the rules. |
Quote:
|
And for the finishing touch: You're not a dev, period. Accept things as they are and never have an opinion, because life and gaming is easier that way and who cares if people take advantage of other people? Get over it. |
f
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mesmerman
A lot of people play Guild Wars for the lack of a monthly fee. It's nice, I will definitely admit. But I find that in Guild Wars we have a series of problems that are constant. Things the community asks for or complains about go unheeded, and I would say (only considering the players I know personally) customer satisfaction is fairly low, especially (almost only) after the release of Factions.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mesmerman
1) Old issues go mostly unresolved for long periods of time, or permanently.
~ Took 2 years to increase storage space, and a few months to revert HA to 8vs8. 2) Things we didn't want/need are added frequently instead of fixes or additions we request personally. ~Soul Reaping "fix". (And with continuity to my first statement, it's seemingly gone unresolved about a month now.) |
It was made very clear that Soul Reaping was deliberately weakened in PvE as well as PvP. The original suggestion for a change of 0 energy gain from spirits was put forward so that there would be minimal impact to PvE, this was ultimately not the intention of ArenaNet. I hope that answers why this change was not implemented.
G
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mesmerman
I need something more than that. A month is long enough, and I've quit playing because of that, and a few other things. If there were a monthly fee, my quitting playing for a while (and others doing the same) may have meant something to Anet.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ZenRgy
You could always just... quit.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Etta
Yeah, what is this? If you don't like it, to bad, get over it or just stop playing. If you don't like changes in an online games, then just get an offline single player games. This way it will be the same everytime you play. Shame on you, Alan!
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fallot
While a lot of the demands of the community do indeed go unheeded, ANet has a far, far better track record of listening to the community than most subscription MMORPGs I am familiar with (Refer to MMORPG.com forums for SWG, Everquest and its sequel, V:SoH). Therefore I have to assume you pulled your opening paragraph out of your ass. There will always be dissent and dissatisfaction. I am probably one of the least satisfied customers of NC+ANet and even I am hesitant of saying that customer satisfaction is low.
|
Quote:
| I really, really can't see how you can correlate a lack of a monthly fee with these two particular issues. I could understand if you brought up issues like delayed balance, rampant bugs or delayed bug fixes. Heroes Ascent was a not a simple matter for ANet, poor decision or not they did have a sizable community that wanted to keep 6v6. The fact that they actually kept working on the issue rather than let HA wallow in itself should be a point against you. |
Quote:
| It was made very clear that Soul Reaping was deliberately weakened in PvE as well as PvP. The original suggestion for a change of 0 energy gain from spirits was put forward so that there would be minimal impact to PvE, this was ultimately not the intention of ArenaNet. I hope that answers why this change was not implemented. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mesmerman
No, he's whining.
|
Quote:
|
Who's talking about intelligence? |
Quote:
| Yeah, like you!- wait... |
A few outtakes:
[10:50] <ZenRgy-BibleOnDvd> Yeah ban Mesmerman too.
[10:50] <ZenRgy-BibleOnDvd> I hate that guy.
[10:51] <fallot> "Guild: [Penis]"
[10:51] <fallot> hey he's funny
[10:51] <fallot> look, he's a funny man
[10:51] <ZenRgy-BibleOnDvd> GIVE HIM A STICKER
[10:56] <[Law]Fenix> Mesmerman is SO DUMB
[10:58] <fallot> "I don't think this kind of "abuse" would happen in a game with a subscription fee."
[10:58] * fallot touches Mesmerman
[10:58] <Khelevaster> that's where he goes off track
[11:03] <ZenRgy-BibleOnDvd> I'd troll his fadce off but I just got unbanned.
[11:03] <ZenRgy-BibleOnDvd> <_<
[11:04] <Khelevaster> um dont say stupid crap?
[11:04] <Khelevaster> OMG HAI ITS TEH INTARWEB MUST BE RETARDED IN RETURN
And much more.
Quote:
It was condescending. I said it in a way which was meant to demean their motives and how they operate. I thought it would be obvious that I meant when it was needed.
|
And to go back to your first ideas: Storage wasn't needed, yet it was given. Soul Reaping had to be changed, the only people who didn't agree on that were PvE'ers, and they're working on a fix for that right now, period.
Quote:
|
... Wait, what was funny? |
Your comparison is utter bullshit and fails at even showing a relation as how the lack of a fee affects the actual game.
Quote:
| Storage was a problem since the original game that was demanded by the players for the last two years. It's like getting a birthday present late; Sure it's nice and all, but it would have meant something if it had been there when it was needed. |
'Needed'? There we go again... I had plenty of storage space, and I actually have stuff like Naga Fangs, 4 Tapestry Shreds, all the seasonal items etc. nicely on my pvp-focussed chars, who function as mules (such as my Dervish and Assassin).
Quote:
| I need something more than that. A month is long enough, and I've quit playing because of that, and a few other things. If there were a monthly fee, my quitting playing for a while (and others doing the same) may have meant something to Anet. |
Quote:
|
Here, let me fix this: You're not a dev, period. Accept things as they are and never have an opinion, because life and gaming is easier that way and who cares if people take advantage of other people? Get over it. |
I DO have an opinion, and I'm glad with the game as it is. I paid for the games (3 CE's so far, likely a GW:EN CE if there's one coming), and almost 3.4k hours of play, for only 180 euro's.
As a side note, you remind me of my teacher of International Law. Everybody laughs at him because he makes such radical statements, and the worst part about that is, in our exams, if we critique something, it must be similar to his opinion, or he'll let you fail, which is basically the only reason people haven't directly confronted him yet. You should try not to make an arse out of yourself through radical statements, you're not in any position to make Anet or me 'fail a test' or make us do something.
If you want something done... well, I suppose I've told you plenty of times what you could do.
Well duh we have no control over what we want. Anet can do pretty much what it damn pleases.
But...
They do give us what we want. We asked and received hard mode, we ask for skill changes, we receive them, we ask for better tourney and ladder changes, we receive it. Just because they can't work at insane speeds that might suit you, they are still working hard. If they give you an update you don't like, then dont play that aspect of it.
Stop making the flame threads...this is just getting annoying, all you ever do mesmerman is complain, complain, complain. It seems, once again, your on your own on this 1.
The fact that GW can survive without giving a monthly subscription fee, makes the game all the more better. The fact that they can and mostly give us what we want, no matter the time span, makes this game so desirable. Makers of other MMO's would kill to have the respect that players have for Anet.
But...
They do give us what we want. We asked and received hard mode, we ask for skill changes, we receive them, we ask for better tourney and ladder changes, we receive it. Just because they can't work at insane speeds that might suit you, they are still working hard. If they give you an update you don't like, then dont play that aspect of it.
Stop making the flame threads...this is just getting annoying, all you ever do mesmerman is complain, complain, complain. It seems, once again, your on your own on this 1.
The fact that GW can survive without giving a monthly subscription fee, makes the game all the more better. The fact that they can and mostly give us what we want, no matter the time span, makes this game so desirable. Makers of other MMO's would kill to have the respect that players have for Anet.
